UK Data Centres: Gas Power Proposals Branded 'Insane' Amidst Energy Concerns
Executive summary
Two proposed hyperscale data centres in Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire are facing criticism for plans to include on-site gas power stations to provide energy resilience. Councillors and environmental groups have labelled these proposals 'insane' due to their potential climate impact, while developers maintain their energy strategies are still in development.
Reporting based on bbc.co.uk
Why it matters
This report highlights a critical tension in the UK's pursuit of AI infrastructure: the substantial energy demands of hyperscale data centres clashing with net-zero targets. The reliance on on-site gas generation for resilience raises significant questions about the carbon footprint of future AI development and the planning process for nationally significant infrastructure.
Sector impact
Analysis by AI Energy Intelligence UK
Data centres currently consume approximately 2.5% of the UK's electricity. The proposed Quest Park facility alone would require a 1GW power load, while SDC's site would need 300MW. To put this in perspective, 1GW of electricity could power three million average British homes, indicating a substantial increase in demand from these new facilities.
Developers propose on-site gas power for 'resilience' to prevent heavy demand on the National Grid, with plans to connect to the grid once it can meet their specific demands. This indicates a perceived inability of the current grid infrastructure to immediately accommodate such large-scale electricity requirements without additional, dedicated generation.
The government views data centres as 'critical infrastructure' vital for national security and personal data protection, essential to the economy and services. Developers Quest Park and SDC Capital Partners anticipate their projects will create over 1,000 and 400 jobs respectively, alongside significant investment.
While not directly detailed for consumers, the article notes benefits of data centres such as 'faster internet' and 'cloud-based working', implying that consumer access to such services relies on this infrastructure. However, local communities express feeling 'blindsided' by the planning process, suggesting a disconnect between national strategic needs and local concerns.
Key statistics
Figures as reported by bbc.co.uk. See original source for context.
Quotations
"I'm not AI [artificial intelligence] averse, but saying we can't get enough electricity so we need a gas power station is a really terrible idea."
"The International Energy Agency notes that the carbon savings enabled by AI could be three to four times larger than the emissions created by the data centres themselves"
"They're really critical to our economy and they're really critical to the services that we all rely on"
"I'm flabbergasted, it's insane"
"We are not against data centres as long as they come with their own independent energy source – but we assumed that would be renewables."
"Ideally they should be built near the coast to incorporate tidal power, which is totally reliable"
"The biggest concern from local people is the way these NSIP applications happen. The community feels blindsided."
"There are obviously benefits [to data centres]: faster internet, cloud-based working, working from home, but we're bearing the brunt of a lot of national infrastructure in this area."
"It feels like national strategy doesn't make sense – with these gas works required to fuel it, when we're working towards net zero."
"Not building new data centres would simply send investment and good jobs abroad, while leaving Britain dependent on other countries for processing sensitive health and defence data."
"This does not mean a blank cheque for big tech, or that every data centre should be approved. Developers should prioritise clean power, use water responsibly, create British jobs and supply chains, and provide investment to the communities in which they are built."
Long-term implications
The shift in planning regulations, allowing data centres to be approved by the government as 'nationally significant infrastructure projects', suggests a streamlined path for their development. However, the controversy over on-site gas power and the significant carbon emissions estimations (e.g., 4.5m tonnes per year for both plants) pose a challenge to the UK's long-term net-zero commitments and may necessitate a more rigorous environmental framework for future AI infrastructure.
Frequently asked questions
Why are data centres in the East of England being criticised?
Two proposed hyperscale data centres in Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire are facing criticism because their plans include on-site gas power stations, which councillors and environmental groups consider detrimental to climate goals.
How much electricity would these data centres require?
The Quest Park data centre would have a power load of 1GW, and the SDC site would require 300MW. For context, 1GW could power three million average British homes.
What is the climate impact concern?
Foxglove, a campaign group, estimates that if both proposed gas plants operate at full capacity, their combined greenhouse gas emissions could be as high as 4.5m tonnes per year.
How are these data centres getting planning permission?
Data centres can now be designated as 'nationally significant infrastructure projects' (NSIP), allowing them to apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission, bypassing local councils.
What is the government's stance on data centres?
The government has designated data centres as 'critical infrastructure' for national security and data protection, stating that not building them would send investment and jobs abroad. However, they expect developers to prioritise clean power and responsible practices.
Explore related tools
Original source
This story summarises reporting from bbc.co.uk. Read the original for full context.
Read on bbc.co.ukRecommended reports
Independent UK research that expands on the themes in this story.
The environmental cost of AI-generated answers versus conventional search, benchmarked for UK decision-makers. An independent, evidence-based comparison of electricity, water and carbon per query across Google, Gemini, ChatGPT, Copilot, Perplexity and Claude — with forecasts to 2035.
Read the reportThe definitive UK view of AI's electricity, grid and infrastructure impact in 2026. An independent, evidence-based report on demand growth, data centre build-out, AI Growth Zones and the trajectory to 2035 — for UK policymakers, operators and investors.
Read the report
A structured briefing on how artificial intelligence infrastructure is reshaping Britain's power network — from substation bottlenecks to regional investment opportunities and long-term grid risk.
Read the reportGet the UK AI Energy briefing
Analysis on AI, electricity and the UK grid, straight to your inbox.
Evidence behind this story
Our reporting sits on top of the UK AI Energy Index and Data Centre Tracker — a sourced, dated record of AI and data-centre electricity demand, data-centre development and grid pressure.