Government Unaware of UK Datacentre Usage Amidst AI Boom, Raising Energy Concerns

Executive summary
A Freedom of Information request reveals the UK government does not know what its datacentres are being used for, despite environmental impact fears from the AI boom. This lack of transparency is criticised as hundreds of new datacentres seek planning permission and grid connections, with potential consequences for energy and water resources.
Reporting based on theguardian.com
Why it matters
For UK AI infrastructure and energy readers, this article highlights a critical transparency gap: the government lacks insight into the purpose of the datacentres driving AI growth. This absence of information impedes informed decision-making regarding energy allocation, environmental regulation, and infrastructure planning, especially as these facilities place increasing demands on the National Grid and water supplies, directly impacting the UK's energy system stability and sustainability goals.
Sector impact
Analysis by AI Energy Intelligence UK
The article reports that 315 datacentres are currently queueing to connect to the National Grid, indicating a significant anticipated increase in electricity demand. Concerns are raised about the substantial energy consumption, with two planned sites projected to have higher carbon emissions than ExxonMobil in the UK, suggesting considerable pressure on the country's carbon targets and electricity supply.
While not explicitly stated as impacting energy security, the sheer number of datacentres awaiting grid connection (315) and their substantial power demands imply potential strain on the National Grid. The government's lack of knowledge about their usage raises questions about prioritisation of energy resources, especially if large-scale energy consumers are not serving clearly defined national economic or strategic benefits.
The government's stance suggests that a pause on datacentre construction would send investment and jobs abroad, implying that the continued expansion of the datacentre sector is seen as vital for attracting foreign investment and creating employment. However, campaigners argue that prioritising these developments without understanding their purpose could lead to wasteful resource allocation, potentially impacting other essential businesses or infrastructure projects requiring grid access.
Campaigners express concerns that water-hungry datacentres, designated as critical national infrastructure, could be prioritised over households during droughts. Anisah Khan of Global Action Plan states that when individuals face hosepipe bans, datacentres are 'gobbling up grid connections', suggesting potential resource competition that could negatively affect domestic consumers.
Key statistics
Figures as reported by theguardian.com. See original source for context.
Quotations
"not hold the requested information"
"The government plans to steamroller over local opposition so private companies can build these facilities – yet they can’t even explain what the benefits are and who is benefiting."
"What is more ‘critical’ than people’s access to water? What is more ‘critical’ than our need to transition to a low-energy, low-pollution world so we can put the brakes on climate extremes?"
"It’s highly likely that we’re going to end up seeing datacentres given favourable and preferential treatment when it comes to resources that are actually running chatbots or enabling people to do benign and very wasteful, pointless things."
"When individuals across the country are facing hosepipe bans and essential housebuilding is being delayed because datacentres are gobbling up grid connections, what we need is not more chatbots at any cost."
"A pause on building new datacentres would simply send investment and good jobs abroad, while leaving Britain dependent on other countries for the processing of sensitive health and defence data. Put simply: it would be a disaster for jobs and national security."
Long-term implications
The long-term implications point towards potential resource conflicts and a lack of strategic oversight in the UK's digital infrastructure development. Without understanding datacentre usage, the government risks misallocating critical resources like electricity and water, potentially undermining environmental targets and public welfare. The push to bypass local planning via the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project scheme could lead to unchecked expansion with significant environmental and social costs, prompting calls for moratoria and stricter environmental safeguards.
Frequently asked questions
Does the UK government know what datacentres are being used for?
No, a Freedom of Information (FoI) request showed the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology stated it did 'not hold the requested information' regarding the usage of the largest datacentre sites.
What are the concerns about datacentre expansion in the UK?
Concerns include the environmental impact, high resource consumption (electricity and water), lack of transparency, and potential for datacentres to bypass local scrutiny through the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project scheme. There are also worries about their impact on carbon targets and competition for water resources.
How many datacentres are awaiting connection to the National Grid?
There are 315 datacentres queueing to connect to the National Grid.
Are datacentres considered critical national infrastructure in the UK?
Yes, the government designated datacentres as critical national infrastructure in 2024.
What is the government's argument against pausing new datacentre construction?
A government spokesperson stated that a pause would send investment and jobs abroad, and leave Britain dependent on other countries for processing sensitive data, calling it a 'disaster for jobs and national security'.
Explore related tools
Original source
This story summarises reporting from theguardian.com. Read the original for full context.
Read on theguardian.comRecommended reports
Independent UK research that expands on the themes in this story.

The environmental cost of AI-generated answers versus conventional search, benchmarked for UK decision-makers. An independent, evidence-based comparison of electricity, water and carbon per query across Google, Gemini, ChatGPT, Copilot, Perplexity and Claude — with forecasts to 2035.
Read the report
The definitive UK view of AI's electricity, grid and infrastructure impact in 2026. An independent, evidence-based report on demand growth, data centre build-out, AI Growth Zones and the trajectory to 2035 — for UK policymakers, operators and investors.
Read the report
A structured briefing on how artificial intelligence infrastructure is reshaping Britain's power network — from substation bottlenecks to regional investment opportunities and long-term grid risk.
Read the reportGet the UK AI Energy briefing
Analysis on AI, electricity and the UK grid, straight to your inbox.
The measured evidence behind this story
Our reporting sits on top of the UK AI Energy Index — a sourced, dated record of AI and data-centre electricity demand, data-centre development and grid pressure.
View the full index