Back to Analysis & Research

Ofgem's Proposed Data Centre Connection Reforms: What Would Change?

Ofgem wants data centre developers to put money and evidence behind grid connection applications. We set out the proposed commitment fee, the new milestones and what remains undecided.

Peter Flynn18 September 20266 min readGrid and Infrastructure
Ofgem's Proposed Data Centre Connection Reforms: What Would Change?

Key findings

  • Ofgem proposes a refundable Data Centre Commitment Fee for connection applications of 40 MW and above, indicatively 2.5-7.5% of average capital cost, roughly £237,500-£712,500 per MW.
  • Three new queue milestones would require evidence of compute offtake, long-lead procurement, and financial and technical capability.
  • Contracted demand connection offers rose from 41 GW in November 2024 to 125 GW in June 2025, of which around 73 GW is data centres across roughly 315 projects.
  • Queue capacity is contracted connection capacity, not electricity consumption; GB peak demand in winter 2025/26 was around 45 GW.
  • Ofgem's own materials cite both around 73 GW and 'at least 80GWs' for the data centre share; the discrepancy is unresolved.
  • Nothing is in force. The consultation closed in September 2026 and a decision is expected later in 2026.
Share

Executive summary

Ofgem is consulting on making data centre developers put money and evidence behind their grid connection applications. Its proposed reforms — published on 29 July 2026 and closed to responses in September 2026 — would introduce a refundable Data Centre Commitment Fee for projects of 40 MW and above, plus additional queue milestones requiring evidence of commercial demand and procurement progress. Nothing here is yet in force. Ofgem has said it intends to decide later in 2026, and the detail that matters most to developers — the exact fee level, exemptions and transitional treatment — is precisely the detail still open.

Why this matters to the UK

Britain's connections queue is the gatekeeper for almost every large electricity project, whether that is a wind farm, a battery site or a data centre. When the queue fills with applications that may never be built, projects that would be built wait behind them. Ofgem's consultation states that contracted demand connection offers rose from 41 GW in November 2024 to 125 GW in June 2025, of which around 73 GW across roughly 315 projects are data centres. For comparison, Britain's peak electricity demand in winter 2025/26 was around 45 GW.

That comparison is easy to misuse. Queue capacity is requested or contracted connection capacity — a maximum permitted import at a point on the network, at some future date. It is not electricity being consumed today, and it is not a forecast of consumption. A site can hold a 100 MW connection and draw far less. We explain the distinction in why data centre megawatt announcements can mislead.

A figure worth watching carefully

Ofgem's own materials are not internally consistent on the data centre share. The consultation document works from roughly 73 GW; the accompanying press release refers to data centres seeking "at least 80GWs" of capacity while elsewhere citing the same 73 GW consultation figure. Both statements come from the same regulator on the same day. Until Ofgem reconciles them, the honest position is that the data centre share of the queue is somewhere in the region of 73–80 GW, depending on the cut-off date and how projects are classified — not a single settled number.

The problem Ofgem says it is trying to solve

Ofgem's argument is that the connections process currently costs an applicant very little relative to the value of holding a queue position. A developer can secure a place, hold it while options are explored, and withdraw late with limited consequence. The consultation also notes that around 9 GW of transmission queue projects were modified from battery storage to data centres between May 2024 and August 2025 — a change of technology within an existing queue position rather than a new application.

The consultation frames the scale in capital terms: at an indicative average of around £9.5m per MW, the data centre capacity in the queue would imply capital expenditure of a magnitude comparable to a substantial share of UK GDP. Ofgem's inference is not that all of this will be built — it is that plainly not all of it can be, and the network is currently planning around applications that carry no test of seriousness.

What is actually being proposed

Proposed measureIntended purposePractical implicationStatus
Data Centre Commitment Fee, secured for projects of 40 MW and aboveImpose a real cost on holding a queue positionSecurity must be in place from acceptance of a connection offer until energisation; returned on delivery, forfeited on termination or non-complianceProposed — consulted on, not in force
Fee level set at an indicative 2.5–7.5% of average capital cost, roughly £237,500–£712,500 per MW of requested capacityMake the fee material enough to deter speculative applicationsA 100 MW project would need to secure a sum in the tens of millions of poundsProposed — range consulted on, final level undecided
New milestone M0.5.Dc — choose a commercial pathway and provide non-binding evidence of compute offtakeTest early whether there is a customer for the computeDevelopers declare either self-operation or a lease-or-sale pathway at an early stageProposed
New milestone M2.Dc — evidence of long-lead equipment procurementTest that delivery has started in practice, not only on paperProcurement of items such as transformers and cooling plant must be evidencedProposed
New milestone M6.Dc — evidence of financial and technical capability; binding compute offtake evidence on the lease-or-sale pathwayConfirm the project can be financed and operatedLate-stage projects face a firmer commercial test than todayProposed
Self-declaration of data centre status by director-signed letterIdentify which projects are in scopeUses the data centre definition in the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill; to be codified in CUSC section 11Proposed
Governance for adjusting the fee through NESO's licenceAllow the fee to be kept effective over timeTwo options consulted on: regulatory discretion, or a fixed periodic review; a short window would let affected projects exit without paying an increased feeProposed — option not yet chosen

Who would be in scope

The threshold Ofgem consulted on is 40 MW, applied to transmission-connected projects and to distribution projects subject to a Transmission Entry Assessment. Ofgem's supporting analysis indicates that projects above 40 MW account for the overwhelming majority of queued data centre capacity, and that very few large distribution-connected projects would fall outside the test. The consultation also sets out exemptions for projects close to connection and transitional treatment for projects already holding offers — the principle is consulted on, the precise cut-offs are not settled.

What it could mean in practice

For developers. Capital would be tied up earlier, and optionality would become expensive. Well-funded operators with confirmed customers are the least affected; the model of securing several sites and choosing later becomes markedly harder. Smaller developers and those building speculatively for a future tenant carry the most exposure.

For network planning. If the fee and milestones work as intended, the queue would shrink towards projects with evidenced demand, and network investment could be planned against something closer to real load. If they do not, the risk is a queue that is smaller but no better evidenced — filtered by access to capital rather than by likelihood of delivery.

For consumers. Ofgem's stated rationale is that speculative applications distort network investment, and that consumers ultimately fund networks built for demand that does not arrive. That is a reasonable argument, but it is a proposition about avoided future cost, not a measured saving. No verified consumer bill impact has been published, and we would treat any specific figure with caution until Ofgem quantifies it in a decision document.

What remains unknown

  • The final fee level within — or outside — the consulted 2.5–7.5% range, and which adjustment governance option is adopted.
  • The precise exemptions and transitional arrangements for projects already holding connection offers.
  • Whether the 40 MW threshold survives consultation unchanged.
  • How the data centre definition operates where a site is mixed-use, or where compute is one part of a larger campus.
  • Whether the reforms measurably reduce the queue. That can only be judged after implementation, against published queue data.

Readers tracking this should watch for Ofgem's decision document, the resulting CUSC modification, and NESO's subsequent queue reporting. We record connection-queue evidence as it is published in the grid pressure section of the UK AI Energy Index, and individual UK projects in the data centre tracker.

Sources

The measures table summarises proposals as consulted on in July 2026. Status will change when Ofgem publishes its decision.

Methodology

Written from Ofgem's consultation document and accompanying press release, both published 29 July 2026 and re-checked on 18 September 2026. Proposals are distinguished throughout from rules in force. Where Ofgem's own figures conflict, both are reported rather than one being selected.

Limitations

The consultation is closed but undecided, so final fee levels, exemptions and transitional arrangements are unknown. Ofgem's data centre share of the connections queue is stated inconsistently between the consultation (around 73 GW) and the press release (at least 80 GW). No consumer bill impact has been quantified by Ofgem.

Sources

  1. Proposed data centre connection reforms (consultation)Ofgem (accessed 2026-09-18)
  2. Ofgem acts to free grid capacity by tackling speculative data centre projectsOfgem (accessed 2026-09-18)

Spotted an error? Request a correction.

Try the numbers yourself

Free interactive tools from AI Energy Intelligence UK — no signup required.

Share
#Ofgem#Connections queue#Grid#Regulation#Data centres
Evidence base

Evidence behind this analysis

Our reporting sits on top of the UK AI Energy Index and Data Centre Tracker — a sourced, dated record of AI and data-centre electricity demand, data-centre development and grid pressure.